We had just resigned ourselves to the fact that even the considerable brainpower assembled in these Europhobic halls would not be enough to figure out what the heck actually happened at the European Council meeting that laid out the draft treaty on institutional reform to be negotiated at the IGC beginning in a week from now. Helpfully, Giscard d’Estaing clarified that, in essence, the new treaty is the constitution only we won’t call it that. Ok. Right. While that in itself takes a while to process, Italian interior minister Giuliano Amato pointed out, the Union’s leaders took an even bigger swing at our sanity. A few days ago he declared “EU leaders decided that the [treaty] should be unreadable. If it is unreadable, it is not constitutional…Should you succeed in understanding it at first sight there might be some reason for a referendum, because it would mean that there is something new.” Come again? Amato deserves a medal for pointing this out, also for saying that the underlying…well…logic was not a good idea. Let us step back and focus our Eurolenses: in essence, our leaders determined that the document should be written in impenetrable Eurobabble, because that is what will make it acceptable to European electorates, because what voters expect from Brussels is incomprehensible complexity. Now, we have paid attention in our Government 101 classes and cannot recall anybody ever suggesting that the way to transparent and democratic government is to be as opaque and undemocratic as possible. We remain puzzled by what is either sheer ignorance or stupidity or both – oh, and whoever provided whatever they are smoking over in Brussels: it is time to share!
Archives
-
-
Flickr Photos



More Photos -
Top Posts & Pages


